One of the less-discussed constraints of the RRSP system is what happens to it at age seventy-one. By the end of the calendar year in which the RRSP holder turns seventy-one, the RRSP must be converted to either a Registered Retirement Income Fund or an annuity. The conversion itself is not a taxable event, but what follows is. The RRIF imposes minimum annual withdrawal amounts, calculated as a percentage of the account value that increases each year as the account holder ages. These mandatory withdrawals are fully included in the account holder net income as pension income, regardless of whether the retiree needs the income, wants the income, or would prefer to keep the capital growing inside the registered account for another decade. A participating whole life policy has no equivalent forced withdrawal mechanism. The capital inside the policy moves when the policy owner chooses to move it, on terms they control, for purposes they determine.
Why mandatory RRIF withdrawals create tax problems for successful retirees
The mandatory RRIF withdrawal schedule creates a specific and increasingly recognised problem for Canadians who have accumulated more RRSP savings than they need to draw in early retirement. Consider a professional who retires at sixty with six hundred thousand dollars in RRSP savings and a pension or investment income that already covers their living expenses comfortably. By seventy-two, the RRIF minimum on that six-hundred-thousand-dollar account at the applicable minimum percentage is approximately thirty-three thousand dollars per year, increasing annually. That thirty-three thousand dollars is income whether the retiree needs it or not. It adds to net income. It may trigger OAS clawback. It may push the retiree into a higher marginal bracket. And it cannot be reinvested inside the RRIF after it has been withdrawn. The government mandatory withdrawal schedule, designed to ensure that tax-deferred capital eventually passes through the tax system, extracts that tax according to a timeline the retiree did not choose and may not find optimal.
How the participating whole life policy stands apart from this constraint
The participating whole life policy has no government-mandated withdrawal schedule at any age. The cash value continues to accumulate. The death benefit continues to grow through paid-up additions. Policy loans can be taken at any time for any purpose, but they are optional. The policy owner is not required to access the policy at seventy-one, or seventy-five, or eighty. The capital inside the policy remains entirely under the owner control, growing on a tax-deferred basis, available for deployment through policy loans when the owner judges that deployment is optimal, and passing to beneficiaries as a tax-free death benefit when the owner dies, whenever that is. This combination of voluntary access and tax-free terminal transfer is something the RRIF system structurally cannot provide.
For retirees who would prefer not to take RRIF income in a particular year because their other income is already sufficient and the RRIF withdrawal would push them into clawback territory, the policy loan is an alternative income source that supplements without triggering mandatory additional withdrawals from the registered system. And for retirees who want to leave as much capital as possible to their heirs in the most tax-efficient form available, the policy death benefit accomplishes that objective in a way that a RRIF, which must be fully included in the estate holder income in the year of death or transferred to a surviving spouse, cannot.
RRIF minimum withdrawal percentages are set by the federal government and subject to legislative change. The tax treatment of RRIF withdrawals and life insurance policy loans depends on individual circumstances and current tax law. This content is educational only and does not constitute personalised tax or retirement planning advice. Consult a qualified accountant and licensed Financial Security Advisor.
The book
Read the whole argument in one place.
Four parts, twelve chapters, fifty-two benefits — written for Canadians, under Canadian rules, with the limits stated alongside the advantages.
Publishing shortly in English and French · Educational content only · Dividends are not guaranteed · Not suitable for everyone